Fall 2004 Course
3 Credits, Lab 0.5
Psychology
110-9
Fundamentals
of Psychology
Catalog Description: An introduction to the
scientific study of behavior through a survey of psychology’s principal
methods, content areas and applications. Course requirements include participation in
psychological research or preparation of a short article review.
Time & Place: MWF
Lab for
majors W
Instructor: Christie Karpiak, Ph.D. Office: AMH 129
Phone: 941-5886 E-mail: karpiakc2@scranton.edu
Office Hours: M & F
Required Text:
Wade, C., & Tavris, C. (2003). Psychology (7th edition).
Course Goals:
Welcome,
majors, to the field of psychology! This course will provide an introduction to
the history of this science, current topics, major theories and approaches, and
future directions. We will debunk common misconceptions about psychology and
human nature as we read about and discuss findings generated from the many
diverse areas within this field. There will be ample opportunity for you to
begin to identify the areas that seem most interesting to you as you consider
pursuing a degree in psychology. You will need to read and remember lots of
facts, definitions, and other information. Beyond the retention of relevant
information, this course will emphasize the importance of learning how
to think about issues and findings in psychology. It is a complicated business
studying ourselves, the findings are often counterintuitive, and psychological
issues are often badly represented in the media. Thus, critical thinking skills
are crucial in being an informed and balanced consumer of and contributor to
this knowledge. At the end of this course you should:
1.
have a solid foundation of basic knowledge (facts, definitions, etc.)
about a wide range of psychological topics and areas
2.
be able to apply critical thinking skills to psychological topics in
future courses and psychological information in your life in the real world
3.
understand psychology as a science—participate in research and
review a number of important studies to facilitate understanding of some of the
ways in which psychologists go about gathering information.
Evaluation: There are four components to your grade:
1.
Weekly quizzes, worth a total of 50% of your grade.
2.
Two assignments, worth a total of 35% of your grade.
3.
A final exam, worth 15% of your grade.
4.
The departmental research requirement (see below).
Quizzes are given weekly and are
designed to assess your grasp of the concepts that are covered in the text and
lectures. Each is worth 10 points and consists of 10 multiple choice questions.
5 questions come from the lectures given or films viewed during the preceding
classes, and 5 from the reading assigned for the day of the quiz (material we
have NOT yet covered in class).
The
final exam is worth 30 points (15%
of your final grade), and consists of 30 multiple choice and 2 short essay
questions. Half of the multiple choice questions come from the final lectures
and reading assignments, and the other half cover major concepts from the rest
of the course. True to its name, this exam occurs during finals week. An optional, cumulative exam will be given
immediately following the final exam. The cumulative exam score can improve a
low quiz total but it is fully comprehensive and difficult, and should only be
taken if necessary. NOTE: The cumulative
exam is not offered to make up poor quiz grades resulting from excessive
unexcused absences. Zeros earned on regular quizzes due to unexcused absences
cannot be remedied through good performance on this exam.
Two
assignments are also required, the
first worth 30 points and the second worth 40 points. They are intended to
provide thought-provoking, hands-on experiences with relevant material. Detailed
descriptions of the assignments are attached to this syllabus.
Your
final grade for this course will consist of:
Scores from 10 quizzes 100
Final exam 30
Assignment #1 30
Assignment #2 40
Total 200 possible points
The departmental research
requirement, described below, does not add to your points for the course, but
failure to complete it will drop your grade by ½ step (e.g., from an A- to a
B+)
The
grade breakdown is as follows (point breakdown is approximate):
A 94-100% 187-200
pts.
A- 90-93 179-186
B+ 87-89 173-178
B 84-86 167-172
B- 80-83 159-166
C+ 77-79 153-158
C 74-76 147-152
C- 70-73 139-146
D+ 67-69 133-138
D 64-66 127-132
Fail 63
& below 126 and below
Departmental
research requirement: This requirement is detailed on the handout entitled “Research
requirement for psychology 110.” As you will see, the grade you earn in this
class will be lowered by one step (e.g., from a B to a B-) if you do not
complete the research requirement, either by participating in 2 research
activities, writing summaries of 2 research papers, or completing one of each.
Attendance, Participation,
& Honesty:
Regular
class attendance is expected and is important in order to do well in this
course. If absent from a lecture, you are responsible for the material covered.
You are also responsible for knowing all announcements made in class, including
those related to any changes in the attached schedule.
Please
refer to the University’s Academic code
of Honesty (revised May 1998). Dishonest examination or quiz behavior on
your part will result in the assignment of a grade of F for the course. Dishonest
behavior in writing a paper (e.g., plagiarism) will result in the assignment of
a grade of F (zero points) for the paper in question. Plagiarism includes
failing to put quotation marks and appropriate citations with material copied
from the work of another, failing to use quotation marks when you’ve changed
only a few words in a sentence or paragraph written by another, “cut and paste”
papers created with information copied from various sources, or otherwise
failing to differentiate your own language and/or phrasing from that used by
the author(s) of the documents you use to pull the paper together. These forms
of plagiarism are common, so be careful. You will receive a grade of F for the
paper for plagiarism, regardless of whether it was intentional or due to
carelessness. Egregious plagiarism—e.g., copying a paper written by another
person or buying a paper online—will result in a grade of F for the entire
course. NOTE: We will use www.turnitin.com,
a program offered through the library, to check your papers for copied content.
If you object to use of this program, you need to make alternative arrangements
with me by October 6th.
Hints for avoiding plagiarism
in this class:
1. Start the paper well in advance of the due date--don’t
procrastinate.
2. Read
all background information at least once before you start to write.
3. Try to
summarize main points from sections, pages, or even entire articles rather than
focusing on single sentences or paragraphs. It’s almost impossible to take a
single sentence from a source and summarize it without either plagiarizing or
resorting to quotation marks.
4. Keep
internet sources separate so you can find/cite them properly (print or save
each separately).
5. Ask
me, your Freshman Seminar faculty, or the qualified people at the campus
writing center for help you if you are uncertain. Good, clear examples can be
found on the turnitin.com website, and on pages 159-165 of the following book,
available in my office for review by interested students: Kirszner, L. G. & Mandell, S.
R. (2004). The Pocket
Handbook for Psychology (2nd Ed.).
Classtime Activities:
Our
classroom time will involve lectures, discussions, films, and demonstrations.
The primary function of the lectures is to supplement the textbook. The
lectures will, therefore, contain information not found in the text. You are
free to decline participation in any classroom discussions or activities.
Web Resources:
I
rely heavily on Blackboard for communication of quiz grades, announced changes
to the schedule, and central storage of the syllabus and other documents for
reference.
The
text publisher provides a website with outlines, study tips, and practice
quizzes at www.prenhall.com/wade. My
quizzes are more difficult (conceptual and applied) than the practice quizzes,
but several students in past years have improved their performance on my
quizzes by including this website in their approach to studying for the course.
You
will send your papers to me electronically through turnitin.com. To gain access
to the course page, you need to go to www.turnitin.com,
then enter the following class ID: 1159219 and password: barnaby.
You will also bring a hard copy of the papers to me in class on the due dates,
because (unfortunately for the trees) I like to provide detailed feedback with
your grades for the papers.
Fall 2004 Course Schedule
(I reserve the right to make changes as needed. Changes will be announced
in class and/or on Blackboard)
Aug
30 M Syllabus,
Introduction [1]
Sep 1 W What is psychology? [1]
Sep 3 F Critical
thinking [1]
Sep 6 M Labor
Day, no classes
Sep 8 W How
psychologists do research [2], Quiz # 1
Sep 10 F continued
[2]
Sep 13 M Evolution,
genes, and behavior [3], Quiz # 2
Sep 15 W continued
[3]; Neurons, hormones, and the brain [4]
Sep
17 F continued
[4]
Sep 20 M Body
rhythms and mental states [5], Quiz # 3
Sep 22 W continued
[5], sensation and perception [6]
Sep 24 F continued
[6]
Sep
27 M Learning
and conditioning [7], Quiz #4
Sep
29 W continued
[7]
Oct
1 F continued
[7]
NOTE: THE 2ND IS THE LAST DAY TO
REGISTER TO VOTE IN MOST STATES
Oct
4 M Behavior
in social and cultural context [8], Quiz
#5
Oct 6 W continued
[8]
Oct 8 F continued
[8]
Oct 11 M Thinking
and intelligence [9], Quiz #6
Oct 13 W continued
[9], assignment # 1 due
Oct
15 F continued
[9]
FALL BREAK OCTOBER 16 - 19
Oct 20 W Memory
[10]
Oct 22 F continued
[10]
Oct
25 M Emotion
[11] Quiz # 7
Oct 27 W continued
[11]
Oct 29 F Motivation
[12] Guest Lecture/Evolutionary Psychology: Dr. Tim Cannon
Nov
1 M continued
[12], Quiz # 8 NOV 2ND IS ELECTION DAY. VOTE.
Nov
3 W Theories
of personality [13]
Nov
5 F continued
[13]
Nov 8 M Development
over the lifespan [14], Quiz # 9
Nov 10 W continued
[14]
Nov 12 F continued
[14]
Nov
15 M Health,
stress, and coping [15], Quiz # 10
Nov
17 W continued
[15]
Nov 19 F Psychological
disorders [16]
Nov 22 M continued
[16], Quiz # 11
THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY NOVEMBER 24 - 28
Nov 29 M continued
[16]
Dec
1 W assignment # 2 due, discussion
Dec 3 F Approaches
to treatment and therapy [17]
Dec 6 M continued
[17], Quiz # 12
Dec
8 W continued
[17]
Dec
10 F continued
[17]
Dec
13 M wrap
up
Dec 14 T FINALS
BEGIN Final Exam & Optional Cumulative Final
Assignment # 1
Psychology 110
Fall, 2004
Thought Paper: Social Psychology
Research
This paper will provide you
the opportunity to read an original journal report of classic psychological
research and think in depth about the findings. The studies (you will select
only one to analyze) are summarized in your text and lab book, and will be
addressed in some detail during lecture. You are to integrate information from
these sources with the results of recent studies, current events, information
from other courses, or personal experiences.
The purpose of this paper is not
to summarize the article. One paragraph reviewing the content is sufficient.
Yes, I want to know you read it, but that will become apparent in your analysis
as you react and respond to specific aspects of the material. Try to keep the
entire paper down to no more than five double-spaced pages. As always, talking
with classmates about the material is encouraged, but producing a paper that is
a joint effort (with classmates or internet paper-sharing services) is strongly
discouraged. Plagiarism will result in a grade of F (zero points) on this paper,
unless it is blatant (copying a paper from last year’s students, buying a paper
on the internet). Blatant plagiarism will result in a grade of F for the
course.
1. Select
only one of the following two
original social psychology articles. I have placed them on reserve and
e-reserve at the library. Read your chosen article.
Asch, S.
E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific
American, 193, 31-35.
Darley, J. M., & Latane,
B. (1968). Bystander intervention
in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 8, 377-383.
2. Provide
your impressions of the material. For example, do you find the results
surprising (or would you have found them surprising prior to lecture/lab)? Do
you believe they run contrary to what people in general would expect (counter
to intuition)? Do you agree or disagree with the author? Are there questions
you would like answered? Do you think things (people,
culture) have changed since the classic study was conducted—would the results
be different today?
3. Relate
the material to learning from at least two of the following areas: learning
from other courses (likely: sociology, political science, maybe philosophy);
current events (things that happened recently—sometime during 2004); new
research (a search with PsychArticles, PsychInfo, or Wilson will reveal a number of recent studies
that are based on the concepts from these articles, but don’t use one that is
cited in your lab text); or personal experience (HINT: don’t select this option
unless you have had a relevant personal experience).
Assignment # 2
Psychology 110
Fall, 2004
Critical Thinking about Psychology in
the News
Findings from psychological
studies find their way into the media, often in the form of watered down,
distorted, soundbytes. This is not the classic
“psychobabble” discussed early in the course, which often contains no reference
to research whatsoever. This can be worse—research is referenced in a
simplistic and often inaccurate way, and is automatically viewed as legitimate
because, hey, it comes from research and fits with “common sense.” You are to
identify and critically evaluate a psychological claim from a popular magazine,
newspaper, or the internet, then be prepared to share your findings with the
class during an in-class discussion on December 1st.
If you wish you may work
together with another student, but everyone needs to submit an individual
paper. In other words, think and talk about the project together if you’d like,
search for articles together, but write it up separately. If you decide to work
with someone else identify that person on the top of your paper. The paper
should be no longer than 5 double-spaced pages, and you may use outline form
using the numbering below. HINT: do not procrastinate in identifying your
chosen topic. You need to turn in a copy
of the claim as well as copies of the first page, including the abstract, of
each research article.
1. Identify
a psychological claim in the news, in a popular magazine, newspaper, or on the
internet. National news from an ‘average’ source is best. If you use the
internet, stick to a news source that also exists on TV or in newsprint (e.g.,
CNN headline news website, NYTimes or another
newspaper on line, etc.). Recent examples include: “children are better off if
their mothers don’t return to work”
“DARE proponents say the program works” “smoking causes depression”
2. Answer
the following questions: Do you think people in our society generally agree
with the claim (is it intuitively appealing, “common sense”)? What are the
possible implications of failure to think critically about the claim (e.g.,
increased maternal guilt, harm to children, wasting money or other resources,
raising hopes without foundation)?
3. Evaluate
the claim using the critical thinking guidelines on pp. 5-12 in your text.
Apply as many of the guidelines as are appropriate for the claim you have
selected. Different guidelines will be relevant depending on the factoid you
have selected, but all papers should address the following:
a. how well are
the terms defined?
b. what evidence is provided in support of the claim?
c. are there other possible interpretations of the evidence?
More questions on other side!!!
4. Conduct
a database search for 2 recent original
peer-reviewed research articles on the topic. THESE MUST COME FROM RESEARCH
JOURNALS AND REPORT ORIGINAL RESEARCH STUDIES. If you don’t know what that
means, ask me. At least one of the research articles you locate must come from 2003
or 2004—if you can find the study from which the claim comes,
that is best. Use the research articles to re-evaluate the claim.
Include in your analysis the following:
a. how
accurate was the media presentation of the specific claim (e.g., is that really
what the researchers found)?
b. are
there additional, important qualifiers that were not included in the media
presentation (e.g., the “mothers returning to work” finding holds only for
young infants, for certain aspects of functioning, in poor quality child care
settings, and is most relevant for those whose mothers don’t want to work)?
c. are
there contradictory findings in either of the studies you located?
5. What
is your final analysis of the claim? (I value evidence of critical thinking
here)